Good pilot signal
Recurring work, known users, measurable baseline, governed data, clear owner, and executive visibility.
Evaluation & Pilot Playbook
The goal is not to install AI and hope usage proves the case. A strong pilot starts with a bounded workflow, measures before-and-after outcomes, captures governance evidence, uses Measure Loop to improve the system, and ends with an executive decision on production expansion.
Pilot Operating Model
Srasta pilots should connect the business workflow to the runtime evidence. The loop below keeps the pilot from becoming a demo: every phase creates evidence that can be reviewed by business, security, platform, and executive stakeholders.
Use-Case Selection
Srasta is strongest when the pilot involves company-specific context, governed access, repeatable expert work, and a real decision loop. Avoid broad "AI assistant" pilots. Start with one workflow where better answers, faster review, fewer escalations, or clearer evidence matters.
Recurring work, known users, measurable baseline, governed data, clear owner, and executive visibility.
Vague experimentation, no baseline, no sponsor, no policy constraints, no path to budget, or no production owner.
One business workflow, two to four personas, one or two knowledge domains, and limited tool access.
After evidence lands, add more teams, richer memory, additional tools, stronger policy profiles, and HA topology.
Stakeholders
Defines the business decision, budget path, and production expansion threshold.
Owns the baseline process, user adoption, output review, and final value judgment.
Reviews identity, data boundaries, audit evidence, model access, and tool policy.
Owns install, topology, runtime health, backup posture, upgrades, and support handoff.
Run real tasks, provide feedback, flag corrections, and expose workflow edge cases.
Guides deployment, measures outcomes, tunes the loop, and prepares the executive readout.
Success Metrics
A pilot that only measures model output is incomplete. Srasta should prove that the enterprise can run AI inside real constraints: identity, memory, retrieval, model route, policy, tools, audit, recovery, and user feedback.
Cycle time, manual effort reduced, throughput, review time, escalation rate, and rework avoided.
Groundedness, answer usefulness, repeatability, correction rate, accepted outputs, and failure patterns.
RBAC enforcement, model whitelist behavior, policy blocks, tool approvals, memory scope, and audit completeness.
Install time, health checks, drift visibility, backup verification, rollback posture, and support bundle quality.
Heartbeat state, active users, inference calls, tool calls, last-seen recency, and cap posture.
Named production owner, budget owner, urgency, expansion path, license size, and renewal readiness.
Measure Loop Evidence
Srasta Measure Loop captures more than answer success. It connects persona, workflow, governed context, inference route, policy state, tool action, feedback, and correction patterns so the organization learns which prompts, memory scopes, routes, and playbooks should improve.
Current workflow effort and quality compared with measured Srasta-assisted output.
Context used, model route, latency, tool action, policy decision, audit record, and outcome label.
Prompt fixes, retrieval improvements, memory boundary changes, tool policy changes, and persona training.
Promote when quality improves, governance invariants hold, token cost is acceptable, and recovery paths work.
Timeline
Confirm sponsor, workflow, data boundary, infrastructure path, users, and success rubric.
Deploy Srasta, activate license, configure identity, model route, knowledge, memory, and policy.
Users run real tasks; Measure Loop captures outcomes, corrections, policy behavior, and operator health.
Review evidence pack, ROI narrative, risks, expansion design, commercial fit, and production recommendation.
Executive Readout
Baseline vs observed value, user adoption, workflow impact, and qualitative feedback.
Identity, RBAC, policy, audit, data boundaries, and security-review findings.
Topology, health, runtime truthfulness, backup readiness, rollback readiness, and support posture.
Time saved, risk reduced, quality improved, rework avoided, and the cost of not operationalizing the workflow.
Promote, iterate, pause, or expand, with the next deployment topology and license shape.
Additional personas, knowledge sources, tool policies, integrations, workflows, and reporting needs.
FAQ
Use the free trial for self-serve evaluation. Move to a pilot when the team has a concrete workflow, an executive sponsor, regulated or security-sensitive data boundaries, and a need to prove governance, operator visibility, and measurable workflow value.
A good pilot use case has a real user group, repeatable work, company-specific context, measurable baseline pain, clear policy constraints, and an outcome that an executive can value.
Measure workflow quality, answer grounding, repeatability, time saved, user adoption, escalation rate, policy behavior, audit completeness, operator health, inference latency, and the improvement path for prompts, memory, tools, and routing.
The readout should include the baseline, pilot scope, users and personas, workflow results, Measure Loop findings, security and audit evidence, operator findings, risks, ROI narrative, and the production expansion recommendation.
Next Step
The best pilot is specific enough to measure and important enough to fund when the evidence is clear.